Watching a football match between two encouraging juniors, one an Australian and the other a Fresh Zealander, early in the day this season, I discovered an extremely interesting episode.
At matchpoint down in the 2nd set, the Australian person clearly failed in a try to run down a volley from his opposition. Scooping the ball (which had clearly returned twice) over his opponent’s head, the Australian person continued to deal with the purpose as though it were still “live.”
Meanwhile, the Brand New Zealander, sure the match was over, headed towards the internet to shake his opponent’s hand.
With the exception of the umpire, everyone else who was there, such as the Australian person, realized that the ball had bounced twice. Despite a protest and an to his opponent’s integrity, the Newest Zealander “lost” the point, came quite close to “losing” the set, and, I’m sure, might have found it extremely difficult to win the match had it gone to a third set.
Had that been the case, had the Australian won the match, would it have been an of dishonesty, not loyalty, being the best plan? All things considered, when it concerns sport, is not it a case of winning being everything, even when it requires cheating?
And even if it’s not an incident of either dishonesty being the best policy or of winning being everything, how do you explain to a player who has just lost because of his opponent’s dishonesty that honesty could be the best policy, and that winning, if it requires cheating, (or even if it does not), ISN’T everything.
While others may possibly argue, it is my contention that any try to win by means of cheating automatically makes the cheat as the loser — no matter what the outcome.
Besides the proven fact that any honest viewer can not help but lose all respect for a cheat, a lot more substantially, a cheat can’t help but lose all respect for herself.
No matter how hard he tries, he can’t avoid the negative effects of his dishonest actions. He can not evade the fact that he’s used deceit to get something (a phony gain) that otherwise would not have already been his.
In so doing, he should deal with the self-knowledge — in addition to the information of any spectator — that he has defaulted on the principle of loyalty, and instead, become a cheat. He is able to never feel happy, in the real sense of the term, about his so-called win.
Thus, I would explain to any young football player who has just lost to a, and who, as a result, erroneously thinks that tips do flourish, that nothing could possibly be further from the reality.
And to create my point, I would then ask him if he had want to trade places, if limited to a second, with somebody who has a reputation as a, or if he’d feel good about winning through cheating.
Discussing sports integrity with kiddies is very important for 2 reasons:
The foremost is that activity provides them with one of the most effective opportunities to produce the moral axioms which they could then apply in most spheres and levels of later life.
The second reason is that sports cheats provide the purity of healthy competition a bad name, and must, for that reason, be roundly condemned.
To find out more about it, please go to: cheap black ops cheats