Yet it is a period more easily seen in the media in these times promulgated by the nations defense planners and used quite frequently in reference to the war on terrorism.
Asymmetric warfare is simply the effective use of distinctive, creative, and unconventional methods with the purpose to defeat a technologically superior and numerically enemy. It requires several forms including combat and p…
Asymmetric warfare is as strange to typical 21st century Americans whilst the Martian landscape.
Yet it’s a period more readily heard in the media in these times promulgated by the nations security planners and used quite frequently in mention of the war on terrorism.
Asymmetric warfare is just the application of unique, creative, and unusual techniques with the purpose to defeat a numerically and technically superior enemy. It will take several forms including combat and psychological warfare.
The 9/11 assaults and bombing of the U.S.S Cole were examples of applying this kind of warfare as were the current verbal attacks by Venezuelan and Iranian presidents upon the United States Of America at the UN.
Though asymmetric combat has its roots as far right back because the Trojan Campaign in Ancient Greece and Hannibals attack on Rome, it was Americans that brought it to an artwork form, or even a pure science.
Some have stated that asymmetric warfare can be as American as apple pie.
Not many military historians would dispute that the Continental Army of the Revolutionary War and the Army of Northern Virginia during the Civil War fostered kinds of asymmetric war at its best.
The guerrillas Francis Marion (the Swamp Fox) and Daniel Morgan (hero of the Cow Pens) drove General Cornwallis from Sc. On a grander scale General Washingtons victory at Trenton was a superb exemplory instance of this kind of warfare. So was Stonewall Jacksons Valley of John Mosbys uses and Virginia Campaign during the Civil War, as well as Douglas MacArthurs island hopping campaign during World War II.
A significant area of the new Rumsfeld Doctrine sees the concept of asymmetric warfare to such a high degree that it is changing Americans global defense posture on a base. It is no secret that top brass within the Pentagon and the Defense Secretary are locking horns over the matter on a horde of retired generals, not to mention an extremely frequent basis increasing alarm bells.
Our leaders tell us that asymmetric warfare is a new and unproven field of military endeavor utilized by terrorist cells and terrorist countries bent on our destruction. That individuals don’t fully understand and grasp the type of the Islamic fundamentalist brain — and have not faced such an established or fanatical foe.
Somebody needs to tell that to the boys who served on these aircraft carriers in the South Pacific during World War II. These Japanese kamikazes and kaitens were just like dedicated to their Emperor as Islamic fundamentalists are to Allah.
We couldn’t stop those crazed Japanese willing to sacrifice their lives in the name of the cause and neither can we stop the specific Islamic radicals bent on attacking our homeland.
The big difference today is theres no Harry Truman at the helm.
That easy farmer from Missouri knew the head of the octopus must be killed in order to stop the carnage being caused in the central and south pacific theaters of war.
So he did — effectively and quickly.
And this begs the question.
Just how long are American leaders going to allow terrorist concentrated nation-states to finance and use uneven warfare — through their proxy organizations such as al-Qaeda — against the United States and continue steadily to divert attention from the more important strategic issues accessible, such because the growing Chinese threat?
Some say it is a diversionary ploy designed to shift the publics attention away from other important issues such the environment, industry problems, job losses, and income stagnation.
The Bush Administration wants us to trust the war on terror is a multi-decade long struggle requiring a redeployment of American defense resources far from cold war postures.
U.S. leadership comes with an personal understanding of asymmetric warfare.
If it does not interdict the usage of this life-threatening form of tactical warfare against Americas important interest immediately, employing whatever means required at its disposal — nevertheless unpleasant — it’ll fundamentally employ a negative impact on both the economic and military institutions of the nation and a profound impact on its political stability as well.
And perhaps thats what our enemies need in the end. And then your octopuses of the entire world can eat that apple pie for desert.
To know more, please go to: go here